Somebody Help Me With Pornography Here...
Prostitution is illegal. But making porn movies is legal, right? Which means that it's illegal to pay someone for sex...unless you film it and sell copies. How does this make sense? Or rather, since it doesn't make sense, how did this bizarre double standard emerge? Does anyone know?
UPDATE: Looks like Andrew Sullivan, via a proxy, is asking the same thing. Now I feel in touch with the zeitgeist.
Labels: current events
4 Comments:
Here's another good article on it:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/10/spitzer/index.html
Yes, it makes no sense. And the bizarre part is, nobody seems to notice or mention it much. You'd think this would be a fundamental argument for those who want to ban porn! Or, the other way, by those who want to legalize prostitution. This is a crazy country, man.
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132370&page=1
The Url above explains the difference. Nixon tried to ban porn, Reagan tried to ban porn, then the GOP crusade against porn stopped. Why did this happen? Because Paris Hilton's daddy gets an extra $15 out each of the 85% of the pay per view movies rented in his hotels because they're porn flicks. Money beats BS morality every time.
Slate Explainer actually tried to explain it and did a fair job:
http://www.slate.com/id/2186552/
Post a Comment
<< Home